New Congress
Won’t Rock Boat
Pet retailers and breeders probably won’t see much change
in direction on federal legislation that impacts the pet trade—despite
the power shift in Congress resulting from the November 2006
elections, according to the Pet Industry Joint Advisory Council
(Washington).
“Although there are some who believe that Democrats
tend to be more sympathetic to animal welfare issues, my experience
is that this is highly dependent on the individual legislator,”
said Mike Maddox, legislative director for PIJAC. “The
reality is that there is a certain measure of uncertainty
with this new Congress. While there was a shift in leadership,
the Congress as a whole likely moved more to the center.”
Although foreign policy and budget issues likely will capture
lawmakers’ attention initially, the National Aquatic
Invasive Species Act will come before Congress in coming months.
In addition, Congress may hold oversight hearings prior to
the June meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention
on International Trade in Endangered Species, said Maddox.
Furthermore, a new form of the Pet Animal Welfare Statute
of 2005, a bill to regulate high-volume animal breeders who
sell directly to the public—not just wholesalers currently
covered under the Animal Welfare Act—is likely to be
reintroduced, Maddox said. The controversial bill was heavily
championed by Sen. Rick Santorum (R-Pa.), who lost the 2006
election to his Democratic opponent, Robert Casey Jr. “Santorum’s
defeat, of course, is significant for the PAWS bill, and whatever
progeny there is for that legislation,” Maddox said.
He did not speculate when a new version of the bill might
be introduced or what specific provisions could be included.
PAWS’ new backer may be Sen. Dick Durbin, a Democrat
from Illinois. Durbin’s staff told representatives of
the American Kennel Club (New York) that the senator intends
to introduce a version of PAWS this session, according to
the Web site for the Sportsmen’s and Animal Owners’
Voting Alliance.
Also of concern, said SAOVA, is an anticipated bill or U.S.
Department of Agriculture rulemaking to require dog breeders
to microchip their animals and perhaps add owner/dog information
to a national database.
Animal advocacy groups such as The Humane Society of the
United States (Washington) also are putting more pressure
on legislators. Wayne Pacelle, president and chief executive
officer of the HSUS, made clear his organization’s commitment
to legislation and lobbying as vehicles to move its animal
rights agenda forward during the “Taking Action for
Animals” conference in Washington last September, according
to Philip Lobo, communications director for the Animal Agriculture
Alliance, a nonprofit organization based in Arlington, Va.,
that promotes the interests of agribusiness.
Indeed, several recent newspaper accounts have detailed HSUS’s
growing financial and political clout, partly as a result
of the 2004 formation of the Humane Society Legislative Fund,
organized under a tax law that allows nonprofit groups to
spend money actively campaigning for and against lawmakers.
HSUS also was bolstered by mergers with the Fund for Animals
in 2005 and the Doris Day Animal League last September, giving
it 10 million members--more than twice the membership of the
powerful National Rifle Association, reported a November 2006
Wall Street Journal article, “Puppy Power: How HSUS
Gets the Vote Out.”
In flexing its newfound muscle, HSUS has joined the big leagues:
It spent more money ($3.4 million) on congressional elections
and ballot initiatives than Exxon Mobil Corp., and contributed
more money ($150,000) to candidates for Congress than Halliburton
Co., said the Wall Street Journal article.
According to Lobo of the Animal Agricultural Alliance, other
significant changes at HSUS include its constituency: “It
is clear that HSUS has found—and is cultivating—a
segment of activists that are educated, organized professionals
capable of making calculated moves to further the organization’s
influence.”
Monitoring key issues that could affect the pet industry
remains a top priority, said Maddox. “PIJAC will be
following very closely the development of pet-related initiatives
at the federal as well as the state level, and intends to
ensure that such initiatives are both good for pets and do
not adversely affect the availability of companion animals
to the pet-loving public,” he added. [February 2007
PET AGE]
|